Information portal "Oglaskaspb.com" is designed to informing the business community. We can give wide publicity to your story in case other publications are not able to do this on some reasons.

We will bring attention of journalists and officials to your issue that will make your opponents act within the legal field.

You can always contact us via email: oglaskaspb12@gmail.com


False creditor failed to get profit from "RosModulStroy"


LLC "Kronoss" which was once convicted of falsifying documents - tried to regain lost position of a super creditor of LLC "RosModulStroy" (established by the oligarchs of the inner circle of the first persons of the state). The Court of Cassation upheld the expulsion of counterfeiters from the register of creditors of “RosModulStroy", so that the debt of the company was decreased by half a billion rubles.


The charming cynicism

Of course, the actions of the Kronoss reps (the name of a character from Greek mythology with a very sad fate) do contain some kind of charming cynicism. After all, no more than 3 months ago, the 13th Arbitration Appeal Court drove the company out of the register of creditors of RosModulStroy on the basis of examination of documents through which the company had got in initially. (http://oglaskaspb.com/eng/bank/a100/). Examination made an unequivocal conclusion: the documents have been forged - and not once, not twice, but systematically and repeatedly.

Representatives of the "Kronoss" did not bother about this fact. They appealed to the Federal Arbitration Court of the North-West District to overturn the decision by the appellate court, which deprived the company of honorary status of a super creditor of "RosModulStroy" with right to claim the debt of half a billion rubles. College of the District Court had to clarify once again to the smart businessmen: falsification of documents, according to which they own a debt, does not mean that they really have one - especially, for the tribunal court.

With regard to the regulation by the 13th Arbitration Appeal Court questioned by Kronoss, the panel of judges of the higher court summarized: "The Court of Appeal came to the correct conclusion that the recognition of the disputed contracts and certificates of acceptance of bills are false forged, and therefore excluded those documents from evidence in the case.

In principle, this judgment of the District Court is final. However, the bad energy of the reps of the former false creditor is now so large that they can easily apply in the Supreme Arbitration Court. So, the story can be continued.


The solid falsification

Let us recall that the fraud in the papers of the Kronoss became known after the company "Evroekspertiza" (Northern-Western Bureau) conducted a expertise of contracts of sale of promissory notes and their acts of reception and transmission. Those bills "RosModulStroy" bought allegedly from a certain LLC "Kronoss" in 2011, and then allegedly they were unable to pay back , and because of that RosModulStroy formed a debt of half a billion rubles to the Kronoss. Thanks to those bills, the Kronoss became not only a part of the creditors of the RosModulStroy during its bankruptcy, but got the most votes on the board of creditors, which allowed him to control the bankruptcy.

The expert came to the unequivocal conclusion that the sale and purchase agreements and acts of reception and transmission of bills signed by the representatives of the RosModulStroy and Kronoss had been forged. The expert examined all contracts and acts, according to which, in 2011, the RosModulStroy bought securities from the Kronoss valued half a billion rubles. And in all cases he concluded two things:

First, the "date specified in the ... (the list of the documents examined follows here - Ed.) do not correspond to the actual dates of the signing of the documents ..."

Second, the "Actual dates of signing ... (then again the examined documents are listed - Ed.) are not longer than one year before the present examination. Signatures were printed not earlier than January 2012...


Given the fact that all the documents studied by the expert dated back to January-April 2011, and we can safely assert that they are simply fraudulent. Moreover, it is not about some small postscript - we are talking about a large-scaled fraud with the plant – it was built in the framework of the national project "Zdorovie", for which Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev officially vouched at the time.


Депутат Соловьев – выходец из порнобизнеса

 Бизнес-досье этого народного избранника выглядит, пожалуй, самым неожиданным. В его биографии присутствует легальное участие в порноиндустрии – он был бизнес-партнеров известно порномагната Сергея Пряннишникова. Все остальное свидетельствует о его стабильном, но скромном по депутатским меркам достатке.


Детектив с тайными агентами

В Петербурге разворачивается очередной шпионский детектив, в центре которого всё то, что необходимо для жанра: продажные сотрудники спецслужб, преступные лидеры задержания и крупные суммы денег.


Как в Третьяковской галерее украли Крым

Третьяковская галерея не сберегла картину Архипа Куинджи «Ай-Петри. Крым». Произведение из собрания Русского музея «ушло» с временной выставки в неизвестном направлении. И не исключено, что в компании дорогой шубы – пропажа именно этого предмета из гардероба, по информации СМИ, стала поводом для вызова полиции. Возврат картины, с учетом ее сюжета, комментаторы в Интернете уже нарекли делом государственной важности.


Дело о четырех миллионах

Бывшая совладелица миллиардного бизнеса Лариса Кузнецова и петербургский консультант Александр Гайдуков обвиняются полицейским следствием Московского района Санкт-Петербурга в мошенничестве. Дескать, вывели из компании «Специальные технологии» четыре миллиона рублей и распорядились по своему усмотрению. Особое внимание средства массовой информации уделяют фигуре Александра Гайдукова, вырастающей у некоторых авторов до масштабов легендарного Голиафа. Так давайте вспомним, как «Голиаф» оказался в «деле о четырех миллионах».